关于有限责任公司股东资格确认的案例分析
发布时间：2019-06-27 16:34
【摘要】：近年来,随着有限责任公司股东资格确认纠纷的增多,如何合理解决该类公司股东资格的具体认定已成为理论界和实务界日益关注的问题。由于现行立法缺乏对股东资格的清晰界定,最高人民法院也未出台统一股东资格认定标准的司法解释,司法实践中法院各自为判,标准极不统一,一定程度损害了司法的权威。司法实务中面对此类纠纷,需要先厘清股东资格认定的指导原则,正确认识公司章程、股东名册、出资证明书、公司登记、出资行为、享有股东权利等证据对股东资格的证明效力,然后区分公司内部纠纷和外部纠纷,依循民法的私法自治原则和商法的外观主义原则,探求当事方的合意,保护善意第三方的利益,根据相关的表面证据和实质证据,公平合理地确认股东资格。在采信证据过程中,特别要注意根据案情正确认定公司登记的效力。应该认为公司登记对公司外的善意第三方具有昭示股东身份的公示力,即善意第三方基于对公司登记的信赖与被其记载的股东交易,即使该记载与事实不符,也不能因此使其交易归于无效；但在仅涉及公司内部纠纷的法律关系中,公司登记并不能因其官方文件的属性而被赋予创设股东资格的法效。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increase of disputes over the confirmation of shareholder qualification of limited liability companies, how to reasonably solve the specific identification of shareholder qualification of this kind of company has become a growing concern in the theoretical and practical circles. Due to the lack of a clear definition of shareholder qualification in the current legislation, the Supreme people's Court has not issued a unified judicial interpretation of the criteria for the identification of shareholder qualification. In judicial practice, the courts are judged by each other, and the standards are very different, which damages the judicial authority to a certain extent. In the face of such disputes in judicial practice, it is necessary to clarify the guiding principles of shareholder qualification identification, correctly understand the proof effect of evidence such as articles of association, shareholder register, capital contribution certificate, company registration, capital contribution behavior and enjoyment of shareholders' rights to shareholder qualification, and then internal disputes and external disputes of district branches, in accordance with the principle of private law autonomy of civil law and the externalism principle of commercial law, to explore the agreement of the parties. Protect the interests of bona fide third parties and confirm shareholder qualifications fairly and reasonably on the basis of relevant prima facie and substantive evidence. In the process of accepting evidence, special attention should be paid to the correct identification of the effectiveness of company registration on the basis of the case. It should be considered that the company registration has the public indication power to the bona fide third party outside the company, that is, based on the trust in the company registration and the shareholder transaction recorded by the company, the company registration can not invalidate the transaction even if the record is inconsistent with the facts. However, in the legal relationship involving only the internal disputes of the company, the company registration can not be given the legal effect of creating shareholder qualification because of the attribute of its official documents.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2506969
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increase of disputes over the confirmation of shareholder qualification of limited liability companies, how to reasonably solve the specific identification of shareholder qualification of this kind of company has become a growing concern in the theoretical and practical circles. Due to the lack of a clear definition of shareholder qualification in the current legislation, the Supreme people's Court has not issued a unified judicial interpretation of the criteria for the identification of shareholder qualification. In judicial practice, the courts are judged by each other, and the standards are very different, which damages the judicial authority to a certain extent. In the face of such disputes in judicial practice, it is necessary to clarify the guiding principles of shareholder qualification identification, correctly understand the proof effect of evidence such as articles of association, shareholder register, capital contribution certificate, company registration, capital contribution behavior and enjoyment of shareholders' rights to shareholder qualification, and then internal disputes and external disputes of district branches, in accordance with the principle of private law autonomy of civil law and the externalism principle of commercial law, to explore the agreement of the parties. Protect the interests of bona fide third parties and confirm shareholder qualifications fairly and reasonably on the basis of relevant prima facie and substantive evidence. In the process of accepting evidence, special attention should be paid to the correct identification of the effectiveness of company registration on the basis of the case. It should be considered that the company registration has the public indication power to the bona fide third party outside the company, that is, based on the trust in the company registration and the shareholder transaction recorded by the company, the company registration can not invalidate the transaction even if the record is inconsistent with the facts. However, in the legal relationship involving only the internal disputes of the company, the company registration can not be given the legal effect of creating shareholder qualification because of the attribute of its official documents.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 张振杰;;公司股东出资问题分析[J];法制与经济(下半月);2008年05期
2 王嫱;;公司章程与股东资格的确认[J];法治研究;2008年05期
3 申蕾;;有限责任公司股东资格的认定应采用形式标准[J];今日南国(理论创新版);2009年01期
4 侯东德;;股东权的契约配置及基本框架[J];金融与经济;2008年08期
5 傅穹;;法定资本制:诠释、问题、检讨——从公司不同参与人的利益冲突与衡量观察[J];南京大学法律评论;2002年01期
6 王东敏;王宪森;;《关于适用公司法若干问题的规定(一)》的理解与适用[J];人民司法;2006年06期
7 吴颉;熊平;;从自我履约协议看股东权益保护[J];特区经济;2007年12期
，本文编号：2506969
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2506969.html