立法模糊性的语义和语用研究

发布时间：2024-04-14 11:48

　　模糊性是语言的必然属性,它广泛存在于我们的语言中。语言模糊性自古希腊以来就受到很多学者的关注,并被从许多角度加以分析定义。本文作者就模糊性给出了他自己的定义,即任何一种可能导致一种以上解释,在意义或范围上具有不确定性的表达形式。自然语言的模糊性源于客观世界的本质以及人类认知和语言的局限性。模糊性可以分为语义模糊和语用模糊,这为本文从语义和语用角度分析模糊性奠定了基础。 法律,作为国家权力象征和保障社会稳定的手段,是通过语言制定、颁布、解释和执行的,法律和语言二者关系密切。大部分关于语言模糊性的研究都是针对日常语言的,对立法模糊性,或立法语言中模糊表达鲜有涉及；在为数不多的研究过立法模糊性的学者中,几乎都是从法学角度而非语言学角度(特别是语义和语用角度)进行分析的。因此,对立法模糊性的语义和语用研究仍有待进一步展开。本文作者采用定性分析和定量分析相结合的方法,利用语义学和语用学相关理论,试图证明语义模糊和语用模糊在立法中普遍存在。并且通过分析立法模糊性的成因,总结出立法模糊性是法律的必然属性,在立法中起着非常重要的作用。通过分析立法模糊性的利弊,作者也简单给出了正确对待立法模糊性的方法,...

【文章页数】：87 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
    1.1 BACKGROUND OF THIS STUDY
    1.2 AIMS AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
    1.3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND DATA COLLECTION
    1.4 ORGANIZATION OF THE THESIS
CHAPTER 2 VAGUENESS IN LANGUAGE
    2.1 LITERATURE REVIEW ON PREVIOUS STUDY OF VAGUENESS IN LANGUAGE
    2.2 DEFINITION OF VAGUENESS
        2.2.1 Definition
        2.2.2 Two Special forms of Vagueness:Ambiguity and Generality
            2.2.2.1 Vagueness and Ambiguity
            2.2.2.2 Vagueness and Generality
    2.3 REASONS FOR VAGUENESS IN NATURAL LANGUAGE
    2.4 CLASSIFICATIONS OF VAGUENESS:SEMANTIC VAGUENESS AND PRAGMATIC VAGUENESS
CHAPTER 3 VAGUENESS IN LEGISLATIVE LANGUAGE
    3.1 LEGISLATIVE LANGUAGE
        3.1.1 Law and Language
        3.1.2 Legislative Language and Judicial Language
        3.1.3 Attributes of Legislative Language
    3.2 LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
        3.2.1 Reviews on Previous Studies of Legislative Vagueness
            3.2.1.1 Reviews on Foreign Studies of Legislative Vagueness
            3.2.1.2 Reviews on Domestic Studies of Legislative Vagueness
        3.2.2 Classifications of Legislative Vagueness
CHAPTER 4 SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
    4.1 INTRODUCTION
    4.2 SEMANTIC FIELD AND LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
        4.2.1 Semantic Field Theory and Its Major Types
        4.2.2 Legislative Vagueness in Synonymy Field
        4.2.3 Legislative Vagueness in Hyponymy Field
        4.2.4 Legislative Vagueness in Antonymy Field
    4.3 HEDGE THEORY AND LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
        4.3.1 Definition of Hedge
        4.3.2 Classification of Hedges
        4.3.3 Analysis of Legislative Vagueness with Theory of Hedge
    4.4 PROTOTYPIC CATEGORIZATION THEORY AND LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
        4.4.1 Prototypic Categorization Theory
        4.4.2 Analysis of Legislative Vagueness by Prototypic Categorization Theory
    4.5 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 5 PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
    5.1 INTRODUCTION
    5.2 COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE AND LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
        5.2.1 Main Content of Cooperative P rinciple
        5.2.2 Application of Cooperative Principle to the Analysis of Legislative Vagueness
    5.3 POLITENESS THEORIES AND LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
        5.3.1 An Overview of Politeness Theories
        5.3.2 Analysis of Legislative Vagueness within the Framework of Politeness Theories
    5.4 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 6 CAUSES AND DEMERITS OF LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
    6.1 CAUSES OF LEGISLATIVE VAGUENESS
    6.2 DEMERITS AND TREATMENT OF LEGISLATIVE AGUENESS
CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSION
    7.1 SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT STUDY
    7.2 IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY
    7.3 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
    7.4 LOOKING FORWARD
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS



本文编号：3954636