关于日本所谓钓鱼岛“无主地先占”的时际法探微

发布时间：2018-04-28 15:19

本文选题：钓鱼岛 + 时际法　；参考：《河北法学》2017年02期

【摘要】：时际法强调事件发生的历史性与国际法规则发展性的统一,注重对事实的尊重。以该原则为指导,不难发现"先占"在领土获得中的地位与要件在不同时期与背景下有所不同。19世纪下半叶国际公法对"先占"原则明确了更为详细的条件,包括无主地的确认、占领的宣告、实效管辖等方面。日本在钓鱼岛主张方面以"先占"为起点,因此应当将日方主张放在其所主张19世纪后半期。结合当时的历史与先占要件进行考察后,我们发现日方的主张难以立足。因为日方一味强调与"先占"原则逻辑上相合性,以至不惜否定和歪曲历史、美化己方非法活动。
[Abstract]:Intertemporal law emphasizes the unity of historical events and the rules of international law, and pays attention to the respect of facts. Guided by this principle, it is not difficult to find that the status and requirements of "preemption" in the acquisition of territory vary in different periods and contexts. In the second half of the 19th century, public international law clarified more detailed conditions for the "preemption" principle. Including the confirmation of landless land, the declaration of occupation, the actual jurisdiction and so on. Japan takes "preoccupation" as its starting point in the Diaoyu Islands, so it should be placed in the latter half of the 19th century. Combined with the historical and pre-occupation elements, we find that the Japanese claim is difficult to stand on. Because the Japanese side insists on the logical consistency with the principle of "preemption", it does not hesitate to deny and distort history and beautify its illegal activities.
【作者单位】：安阳师范学院历史与文博学院;
【基金】：2015年国家哲学社会科学基金项目《中国海洋疆域的形成与管理研究》(15XZS005) 河南省哲学社会科学规划项目《以东、南中国海为中心的历史上我国海疆管控研究》(2015BLS003) 河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目《时际法视野下中日钓鱼岛主权辨析》(2015-QN-068)
【分类号】：D993.1

【相似文献】